Month: August 2016
You don’t have to be a mathematician to know that something stinks with the biased polling for the Presidential election. The crowds for Donald Trump dwarf those of the woman that the liberals are all telling us is the supposed front runner Hillary Clinton. In addition to not being an abrasive criminal who has a record of national destruction and failure herself to go with her only success, that of pilfering the United States into ruin, she’s a continuation of the Obama regime. Who in America other than our enemies really wants four more years of this fiasco?
So it’s hard to believe the polls that say the woman with events that resemble the attendance at high school JV pep rallies is really leading. Something smells decisively rotten at Reuters and the other polling organizations. We might assume just because it is logical and makes sense that the percentages would be calibrated or sampled equally regarding the identity of the voter politically. If they, in the interest of producing a legitimate result, were to ask an equal number of Democrat, Republican and independent voters and when they reached the allotted number of each, stop asking them questions. It’s simple to do. You make the call, if they identify as a Democrat or Republican and you’ve already hit your limit for that category, you politely hang up. It’s what they already do if someone replies that they are not a registered voter. Even if they were structured to allow for a 7 percent larger number of Democrats in the population they’ve overshot the runway by three fold.
Reuters recently recalibrated their polling criteria to favor Hillary Clinton, a fact that was vehemently denounced as the most corrupt thing he’s seen in forty years of politics by Pat Caddell. But they’ve got another trick up their sleeves which involves simply asking more Democrats and then failing to calibrate for the oversampling.
In a recent July 26th poll, the number of Democrats questioned was 26 percent higher than the number of Republicans, forty percent to thirty-two percent, 9,134 to 7,235 of a total combined 72 percent of the total. Since twenty-six percent more Democrats than Republicans were asked who they prefer, the balance being neutral or non-aligned, the results are entirely predictable. Hillary Clinton will be favored among Democrats. By asking more Democrats and then treating them as if they are from a neutral sampling, they’re building an advantage into the Clinton numbers.
It’s a number which is greater than the lead that they claim Clinton has over Trump in most polls and in excess of the margin of error. Polls are what these people do so these things don’t happen accidentally. They are deliberate and with a purpose. The purpose is to get the establishment, anti-American elected president of the United States.
As Donald Trump said in his speech in Connecticut today, he’s not running against Hillary Clinton, he’s running against the crooked media. Reuters is part of that media, providing them with the ammunition they will use to dismiss his candidacy as failing when the opposite is true. Trump is surging. He’s beating them and if the results say otherwise, we’ll know the same shenanigans that Reuters is pulling now have been extended to the election itself.